Termination w.r.t. Q of the following Term Rewriting System could be proven:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

prime(0) → false
prime(s(0)) → false
prime(s(s(x))) → prime1(s(s(x)), s(x))
prime1(x, 0) → false
prime1(x, s(0)) → true
prime1(x, s(s(y))) → and(not(divp(s(s(y)), x)), prime1(x, s(y)))
divp(x, y) → =(rem(x, y), 0)

Q is empty.


↳ QTRS
  ↳ Overlay + Local Confluence

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

prime(0) → false
prime(s(0)) → false
prime(s(s(x))) → prime1(s(s(x)), s(x))
prime1(x, 0) → false
prime1(x, s(0)) → true
prime1(x, s(s(y))) → and(not(divp(s(s(y)), x)), prime1(x, s(y)))
divp(x, y) → =(rem(x, y), 0)

Q is empty.

The TRS is overlay and locally confluent. By [19] we can switch to innermost.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ Overlay + Local Confluence
    ↳ QTRS
      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

prime(0) → false
prime(s(0)) → false
prime(s(s(x))) → prime1(s(s(x)), s(x))
prime1(x, 0) → false
prime1(x, s(0)) → true
prime1(x, s(s(y))) → and(not(divp(s(s(y)), x)), prime1(x, s(y)))
divp(x, y) → =(rem(x, y), 0)

The set Q consists of the following terms:

prime(0)
prime(s(0))
prime(s(s(x0)))
prime1(x0, 0)
prime1(x0, s(0))
prime1(x0, s(s(x1)))
divp(x0, x1)


Using Dependency Pairs [1,15] we result in the following initial DP problem:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PRIME1(x, s(s(y))) → PRIME1(x, s(y))
PRIME(s(s(x))) → PRIME1(s(s(x)), s(x))
PRIME1(x, s(s(y))) → DIVP(s(s(y)), x)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

prime(0) → false
prime(s(0)) → false
prime(s(s(x))) → prime1(s(s(x)), s(x))
prime1(x, 0) → false
prime1(x, s(0)) → true
prime1(x, s(s(y))) → and(not(divp(s(s(y)), x)), prime1(x, s(y)))
divp(x, y) → =(rem(x, y), 0)

The set Q consists of the following terms:

prime(0)
prime(s(0))
prime(s(s(x0)))
prime1(x0, 0)
prime1(x0, s(0))
prime1(x0, s(s(x1)))
divp(x0, x1)

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ Overlay + Local Confluence
    ↳ QTRS
      ↳ DependencyPairsProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PRIME1(x, s(s(y))) → PRIME1(x, s(y))
PRIME(s(s(x))) → PRIME1(s(s(x)), s(x))
PRIME1(x, s(s(y))) → DIVP(s(s(y)), x)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

prime(0) → false
prime(s(0)) → false
prime(s(s(x))) → prime1(s(s(x)), s(x))
prime1(x, 0) → false
prime1(x, s(0)) → true
prime1(x, s(s(y))) → and(not(divp(s(s(y)), x)), prime1(x, s(y)))
divp(x, y) → =(rem(x, y), 0)

The set Q consists of the following terms:

prime(0)
prime(s(0))
prime(s(s(x0)))
prime1(x0, 0)
prime1(x0, s(0))
prime1(x0, s(s(x1)))
divp(x0, x1)

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 1 SCC with 2 less nodes.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ Overlay + Local Confluence
    ↳ QTRS
      ↳ DependencyPairsProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ DependencyGraphProof
            ↳ QDP
              ↳ UsableRulesProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PRIME1(x, s(s(y))) → PRIME1(x, s(y))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

prime(0) → false
prime(s(0)) → false
prime(s(s(x))) → prime1(s(s(x)), s(x))
prime1(x, 0) → false
prime1(x, s(0)) → true
prime1(x, s(s(y))) → and(not(divp(s(s(y)), x)), prime1(x, s(y)))
divp(x, y) → =(rem(x, y), 0)

The set Q consists of the following terms:

prime(0)
prime(s(0))
prime(s(s(x0)))
prime1(x0, 0)
prime1(x0, s(0))
prime1(x0, s(s(x1)))
divp(x0, x1)

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
As all Q-normal forms are R-normal forms we are in the innermost case. Hence, by the usable rules processor [15] we can delete all non-usable rules [17] from R.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ Overlay + Local Confluence
    ↳ QTRS
      ↳ DependencyPairsProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ DependencyGraphProof
            ↳ QDP
              ↳ UsableRulesProof
                ↳ QDP
                  ↳ QReductionProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PRIME1(x, s(s(y))) → PRIME1(x, s(y))

R is empty.
The set Q consists of the following terms:

prime(0)
prime(s(0))
prime(s(s(x0)))
prime1(x0, 0)
prime1(x0, s(0))
prime1(x0, s(s(x1)))
divp(x0, x1)

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We deleted the following terms from Q as each root-symbol of these terms does neither occur in P nor in R.

prime(0)
prime(s(0))
prime(s(s(x0)))
prime1(x0, 0)
prime1(x0, s(0))
prime1(x0, s(s(x1)))
divp(x0, x1)



↳ QTRS
  ↳ Overlay + Local Confluence
    ↳ QTRS
      ↳ DependencyPairsProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ DependencyGraphProof
            ↳ QDP
              ↳ UsableRulesProof
                ↳ QDP
                  ↳ QReductionProof
                    ↳ QDP
                      ↳ QDPSizeChangeProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PRIME1(x, s(s(y))) → PRIME1(x, s(y))

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By using the subterm criterion [20] together with the size-change analysis [32] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs: